Actas dermo-sifiliograficas · 2025
Safety and Efficacy Profile of Anti-IL17 Treatments in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Al-Wattar-Ceballos O, Martínez-Montalvo L, Carmona-Rodríguez M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is difficult to manage, requiring the use of biologic drugs such as anti-TNFα and anti-interleukin 17 (anti-IL17). The aim of our review is to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of anti-IL17 drugs in patients with HS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review with subsequent meta-analysis following the population, intervention, comparison, outcome and type of study (PICOS) method. We included only randomized clinical trials with placebo (S) that included individuals with HS ≥18 years old (P), and who had been on placebo (C) OR, an anti-IL17 biologic drug (I) to measure safety and efficacy outcomes (O). Search was conducted across multiple databases: PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The risk of bias of each study, publication bias, sensitivity analysis, and certainty of evidence were determined.
RESULTS: A total of 320 bibliographic references were obtained, 4 of which met the inclusion criteria. Compared to placebo, the meta-analysis showed a significantly higher percentage of patients achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) OR, of 1.96 [1.79-2.15], a greater decrease in DLQI, MD -1.92 [-2.68,-1.16] and an increase in adverse effects; OR, 1.21 [1.09, 1.34], particularly due to Candida infections; OR, 5.61 [2.66-11.83].
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with anti-IL17 biologic drugs is effective in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. Although these drugs are safe, they should be monitored due to the risk of infections, mainly candidiasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review with subsequent meta-analysis following the population, intervention, comparison, outcome and type of study (PICOS) method. We included only randomized clinical trials with placebo (S) that included individuals with HS ≥18 years old (P), and who had been on placebo (C) OR, an anti-IL17 biologic drug (I) to measure safety and efficacy outcomes (O). Search was conducted across multiple databases: PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The risk of bias of each study, publication bias, sensitivity analysis, and certainty of evidence were determined.
RESULTS: A total of 320 bibliographic references were obtained, 4 of which met the inclusion criteria. Compared to placebo, the meta-analysis showed a significantly higher percentage of patients achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) OR, of 1.96 [1.79-2.15], a greater decrease in DLQI, MD -1.92 [-2.68,-1.16] and an increase in adverse effects; OR, 1.21 [1.09, 1.34], particularly due to Candida infections; OR, 5.61 [2.66-11.83].
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with anti-IL17 biologic drugs is effective in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. Although these drugs are safe, they should be monitored due to the risk of infections, mainly candidiasis.