Ophthalmic research · 2019
Comparison of Subconjunctival Aflibercept and Betamethasone for the Treatment of Formed Corneal Neovascularization in a Rabbit Model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eiger-Moscovich Maya, Livny Eitan, Sella Ruti, Gal-Or Orly, Nisgav Yael, Livnat Tami, Bahar Irit
Аннотация
AIM: To compare the efficacy of aflibercept (Eylea®), a potent antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, with betamethasone (Celestone®) and placebo for the treatment of formed corneal neovascularization in a rabbit model.
METHODS: A central corneal chemical burn was created in the right eye of 24 New Zealand albino rabbits. Four weeks later, the rabbits were randomly divided into 4 equal groups for subconjunctival injection of aflibercept, betamethasone, aflibercept+ betamethasone, or saline (control). Digital photographs taken at weekly intervals were rated by 2 masked observers for extent, centricity, and density of corneal neovascularization according to a predefined scale. The percentage of corneal surface involved by neovascularization was quantified by image analysis software (Fiji-J). The change in corneal neovascularization from treatment administration (4 weeks after injury) to 4 weeks later (8 weeks after injury) was assessed. The rabbits were then euthanized, and their eyes were enucleated and processed for histopathological and immunofluorescence studies.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the change in corneal neovascularization after treatment among the 4 groups according to the digital images (p > 0.15) or histological evaluation with hematoxylin and eosin (p > 0.08). On immunofluorescence assay, a lower VEGF concentration was observed in all treatment groups compared to the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: In this rabbit model, corneal neovascularization induced by chemical burn failed to regress with treatment with aflibercept, betamethasone, or their combination.
METHODS: A central corneal chemical burn was created in the right eye of 24 New Zealand albino rabbits. Four weeks later, the rabbits were randomly divided into 4 equal groups for subconjunctival injection of aflibercept, betamethasone, aflibercept+ betamethasone, or saline (control). Digital photographs taken at weekly intervals were rated by 2 masked observers for extent, centricity, and density of corneal neovascularization according to a predefined scale. The percentage of corneal surface involved by neovascularization was quantified by image analysis software (Fiji-J). The change in corneal neovascularization from treatment administration (4 weeks after injury) to 4 weeks later (8 weeks after injury) was assessed. The rabbits were then euthanized, and their eyes were enucleated and processed for histopathological and immunofluorescence studies.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the change in corneal neovascularization after treatment among the 4 groups according to the digital images (p > 0.15) or histological evaluation with hematoxylin and eosin (p > 0.08). On immunofluorescence assay, a lower VEGF concentration was observed in all treatment groups compared to the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: In this rabbit model, corneal neovascularization induced by chemical burn failed to regress with treatment with aflibercept, betamethasone, or their combination.