Substance P Modulation of Human and Murine Corneal Neovascularization.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of substance P (SP) in patients affected with corneal neovascularization (CNV) and in three different Tac1-knockout (KO) murine models of CNV.
METHODS
SP levels in tears were measured with a multiplex bead assay. The extent of human CNV was quantified as number of affected corneal quadrants. Murine CNV was induced in both strains by means of total disepithelization, alkali burn, and intrastromal sutures. After death, CNV (blood and lymphatic) and leukocyte infiltration were quantified by CD31, LYVE1, and CD45 immunofluorescence, respectively. Trigeminal ganglions were collected for quantitatitive PCR IL1β quantification. Hematoxylin-eosin corneal cross sections and whole-mounted β-3-tubulin nerve staining were used to compare anatomy and nerve density of wild-type (WT) versus Tac1-KO normal mice.
RESULTS
SP tear levels correlate positively with CNV extension in patients (r = 0.49, P = 0.03). After disepithelization, Tac1-KO corneas showed reduced blood and lymphatic vascularization (-34% and -51% respectively) compared with the WT counterpart. CD45+ leukocytes infiltrating the cornea were reduced in Tac1-KO mice as opposed to WT in the disepithelization (P = 0.0001), alkali burn (P = 0.0258), and suture (P = 0.0149) models. Tac1-KO mice showed reduced IL1β expression in the trigeminal ganglion. Normal WT and Tac1-KO corneas did not show significant differences in transparency, thickness, and nerve density.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest (1) the involvement of SP in human CNV; (2) the key role of SP in promoting inflammatory CNV in three different mouse models; and (3) that absence of SP is not associated with obvious ocular surface pathology in a KO model.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.