Association of phase angle versus skeletal muscle mass profiling with body fat mass in relation to glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

While preserving skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is advocated in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), mass-based assessments often overlook muscle quality. This study aimed to investigate whether the balance between cellular integrity (phase angle [PhA]) and metabolic load (body fat mass [BFM]) is more clinically relevant to glycemic control than SMM-based profiling in patients with T2DM. In this cross-sectional study of 622 patients, participants were stratified into four groups based on sex-specific medians of PhA and BFM, and similarly for SMM and BFM. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated associations with glycemic targets (HbA1c <8.0% and <7.0%), adjusting for confounders. Sensitivity analyses utilized continuous Z-scores and interaction terms. High-PhA/High-BFM and High-PhA/Low-BFM groups showed significantly higher odds of HbA1c <8.0% compared with the Low-PhA/High-BFM reference group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-3.44; OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.21-3.64, respectively). Conversely, SMM/BFM combinations showed no significant associations. Neither profile was significantly associated with the stricter HbA1c <7.0% target. In continuous models, the PhA × BFM interaction was significantly associated with achievement of HbA1c <8.0% (p = 0.025), whereas SMM × BFM interaction was not. In conclusion, the PhA/BFM interplay shows a clearer association with glycemic control than SMM/BFM profiling in T2DM. Higher PhA may reflect a more favorable metabolic phenotype against adiposity and is associated with a lower likelihood of severe hyperglycemia (HbA1c ≥8.0%). PhA/BFM profiling offers a novel approach to identify high-risk patients overlooked by conventional mass-based assessments.