Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2016
Conversion cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis-it's not as black as it's painted!
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Spohnholz Johannes, Herzog Torsten, Munding Johanna, Belyaev Orlin, Uhl Waldemar, Braumann Chris, Chromik Ansgar Michael
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is recommended as standard treatment for acute cholecystitis, in 10-30 % a conversion to open cholecystectomy is required. Among some surgeons, this is still perceived as a "complication." The aim of our study was to define characteristics and outcome of patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing conversion cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Over a 9-year period, 464 consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were analyzed for demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, histopathological, and laboratory findings and surgical outcome parameters.
RESULTS: Patients with conversion cholecystectomy were characterized by younger age, lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and less cardiac comorbidities compared to patients with primary open cholecystectomy. Severity of inflammation on the clinical and histopathological level was similar and comparable. Overall complication rate, mortality, and median hospital stay were significantly lower compared to those of primary open cholecystectomy group.
CONCLUSIONS: There are no disadvantages for patients undergoing conversion cholecystectomy compared to primary open cholecystectomy. The outcome is influenced by general condition and comorbidities rather than by the surgical approach. Underlying fear of conversion should not avoid a laparoscopic approach in patients with acute cholecystitis.
METHODS: Over a 9-year period, 464 consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were analyzed for demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, histopathological, and laboratory findings and surgical outcome parameters.
RESULTS: Patients with conversion cholecystectomy were characterized by younger age, lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and less cardiac comorbidities compared to patients with primary open cholecystectomy. Severity of inflammation on the clinical and histopathological level was similar and comparable. Overall complication rate, mortality, and median hospital stay were significantly lower compared to those of primary open cholecystectomy group.
CONCLUSIONS: There are no disadvantages for patients undergoing conversion cholecystectomy compared to primary open cholecystectomy. The outcome is influenced by general condition and comorbidities rather than by the surgical approach. Underlying fear of conversion should not avoid a laparoscopic approach in patients with acute cholecystitis.