Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2023
Neuroimaging biomarkers in Huntington's disease: Preparing for a new era of therapeutic development.
СтатьяОбзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Eimeren Thilo, Giehl Kathrin, Reetz Kathrin, Sampaio Cristina, Mestre Tiago A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A critical challenge for Huntington's disease (HD) clinical trials in disease modification is the definition of endpoints that can capture change when clinical signs are subtle/non-existent. Reliable biomarkers are therefore urgently needed to facilitate drug development by allowing the enrichment of clinical trial populations and providing measures of benefit that can support the establishment of efficacy.
METHODS: By systematically examining the published literature on HD neuroimaging biomarker studies, we sought to advance knowledge to guide the validation of neuroimaging biomarkers. We started by reviewing both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies and then conducted an in-depth review to make quantitative comparisons between biomarkers using data only from longitudinal studies with samples sizes larger than ten participants in PET studies or 30 participants in MRI studies.
RESULTS: From a total of 2202 publications initially identified, we included 32 studies, 19 of which underwent in-depth comparative review. The majority of included studies used various MRI-based methods (manual to automatic) to longitudinally assess either the volume of the putamen or the caudate, which have been shown to undergo significant structural change during HD natural history.
CONCLUSION: Despite the impressively large number of neuroimaging biomarker studies, only a small number of adequately designed studies met our criteria. Among these various biomarkers, MRI-based volumetric analyses of the caudate and putamen are currently the best validated for use in the disease phase before clinical motor diagnosis. A biomarker that can be used to demonstrate a disease-modifying effect is still missing.
METHODS: By systematically examining the published literature on HD neuroimaging biomarker studies, we sought to advance knowledge to guide the validation of neuroimaging biomarkers. We started by reviewing both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies and then conducted an in-depth review to make quantitative comparisons between biomarkers using data only from longitudinal studies with samples sizes larger than ten participants in PET studies or 30 participants in MRI studies.
RESULTS: From a total of 2202 publications initially identified, we included 32 studies, 19 of which underwent in-depth comparative review. The majority of included studies used various MRI-based methods (manual to automatic) to longitudinally assess either the volume of the putamen or the caudate, which have been shown to undergo significant structural change during HD natural history.
CONCLUSION: Despite the impressively large number of neuroimaging biomarker studies, only a small number of adequately designed studies met our criteria. Among these various biomarkers, MRI-based volumetric analyses of the caudate and putamen are currently the best validated for use in the disease phase before clinical motor diagnosis. A biomarker that can be used to demonstrate a disease-modifying effect is still missing.