Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2019
Relationship of infiltrating intraepithelial T lymphocytes in the diagnosis of oral lichen planus versus oral epithelial dysplasia: a pilot study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Flores-Hidalgo Andres, Murrah Valerie, Fedoriw Yuri, Padilla Ricardo J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the type and distribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in oral mucosal specimens to potentially distinguish between underlying alterations or patterns in oral epithelial dysplasia and oral lichen planus.
STUDY DESIGN: This pilot study included 10 archived tissue samples that were received at the University of North Carolina Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Laboratory and were diagnosed as oral lichen planus and moderate to severe epithelial dysplasia. Dual staining with CD4 and CD8 antibodies was carried out on each case. Slides were scanned in the Aperio ScanScope FL (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and archived. Histomorphometric analysis was performed to detect inflammatory cells expressing CD4 and CD8 biomarkers in the epithelial and connective tissue regions.
RESULTS: No differences were found in the amount and ratio of CD4+/CD8+ lymphocytes among the 3 groups analyzed; however, the intraepithelial CD8+ lymphocyte distribution was strikingly different between lichen planus and moderate to severe epithelial dysplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: The localization of CD8+ cells can be potentially useful as an adjunctive diagnostic procedure to distinguish oral epithelial dysplasia from other inflammatory entities, such as lichen planus.
STUDY DESIGN: This pilot study included 10 archived tissue samples that were received at the University of North Carolina Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Laboratory and were diagnosed as oral lichen planus and moderate to severe epithelial dysplasia. Dual staining with CD4 and CD8 antibodies was carried out on each case. Slides were scanned in the Aperio ScanScope FL (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and archived. Histomorphometric analysis was performed to detect inflammatory cells expressing CD4 and CD8 biomarkers in the epithelial and connective tissue regions.
RESULTS: No differences were found in the amount and ratio of CD4+/CD8+ lymphocytes among the 3 groups analyzed; however, the intraepithelial CD8+ lymphocyte distribution was strikingly different between lichen planus and moderate to severe epithelial dysplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: The localization of CD8+ cells can be potentially useful as an adjunctive diagnostic procedure to distinguish oral epithelial dysplasia from other inflammatory entities, such as lichen planus.