The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020
Serum Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin Better Reflect Asthma Control Status Than Blood Eosinophil Counts.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
An Jin, Lee Ji-Hyang, Sim Ju Hee, Song Woo-Jung, Kwon Hyouk-Soo, Cho You Sook, Moon Hee-Bom, Kim Chang-Keun, Kim Tae-Bum
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although several biomarkers have been proposed for eosinophilic asthma, biomarkers for reflecting asthma control status remain controversial. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), a degranulated eosinophil protein, is an emerging biomarker in asthmatic patients.
OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed serum EDN concentrations in asthmatics and compared its performance with that of blood eosinophil count as an indicator of asthma control status.
METHODS: We enrolled 75 uncontrolled asthmatics, 56 controlled asthmatics, and 43 healthy controls from Asan Medical Center. Serum EDN levels (ng/mL) were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The predictability of EDN for asthma control status was analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to compare the performances of a serum EDN level and blood eosinophil count as indicators of uncontrolled asthma status.
RESULTS: The mean serum EDN level in the uncontrolled asthma group was higher than that in the controlled asthma and healthy groups (103.2 ± 60.2 vs 60.8 ± 49.7 vs 49.6 ± 28.3 ng/mL, P < .001). Serum EDN level was the significant parameter related to asthma control status in univariate and multivariable analysis (both P < .001). Serum EDN levels correlated with blood eosinophil counts (r = 0.510, P < .001). However, in the ROC analysis, serum EDN level showed a significantly better performance for predicting uncontrolled asthma status (area under the curve, 0.726 vs 0.628, P = .024).
CONCLUSIONS: Serum EDN levels significantly differed between patients with controlled and uncontrolled status in adult asthmatics. To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify EDN as a better indicator of asthma control status than blood eosinophil count.
OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed serum EDN concentrations in asthmatics and compared its performance with that of blood eosinophil count as an indicator of asthma control status.
METHODS: We enrolled 75 uncontrolled asthmatics, 56 controlled asthmatics, and 43 healthy controls from Asan Medical Center. Serum EDN levels (ng/mL) were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The predictability of EDN for asthma control status was analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to compare the performances of a serum EDN level and blood eosinophil count as indicators of uncontrolled asthma status.
RESULTS: The mean serum EDN level in the uncontrolled asthma group was higher than that in the controlled asthma and healthy groups (103.2 ± 60.2 vs 60.8 ± 49.7 vs 49.6 ± 28.3 ng/mL, P < .001). Serum EDN level was the significant parameter related to asthma control status in univariate and multivariable analysis (both P < .001). Serum EDN levels correlated with blood eosinophil counts (r = 0.510, P < .001). However, in the ROC analysis, serum EDN level showed a significantly better performance for predicting uncontrolled asthma status (area under the curve, 0.726 vs 0.628, P = .024).
CONCLUSIONS: Serum EDN levels significantly differed between patients with controlled and uncontrolled status in adult asthmatics. To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify EDN as a better indicator of asthma control status than blood eosinophil count.