Vestnik oftalmologii · 2025
[Indicators of computer accommodography as predictors of the development of myopic refraction].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Оригинал на русском
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zelentsov R N
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: The diagnostic potential of computer accommodography remains insufficiently studied. At the same time, accommodative and refractive disorders are extremely common today among the youth.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated objective accommodative parameters using computer accommodography in samples of individuals aged 17-19 and 20-23 years with and without a diagnosis of myopia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on a random sample of young working-age individuals (aged 17-19 and 20-23 years) residing in Arkhangelsk. The sample included 210 individuals (420 eyes). All participants underwent a standard ophthalmological examination with diagnosis established in accordance with ICD-10, as well as an assessment of accommodative function using objective computer accommodography with subsequent analysis of accommodograms.
RESULTS: The main accommodogram indicators in individuals without ophthalmic pathology and with a normal accommodative response were calculated for the 17-19 and 20-23 age groups. Data were obtained on the ranges of accommodography indicators in individuals without ophthalmic pathology in the combined 17-23-year age group. Statistically significant differences were identified in the accommodative response stability coefficient (σARS) in individuals without ophthalmic pathology but at risk of developing computer vision syndrome.
CONCLUSION: Thus, in order to standardize accommodogram results in individuals without ophthalmic pathology and with a normal accommodative response, it is recommended to consider the combined age group of 17-23 years. At the same time, the σARS parameter may be recommended for identifying individuals without ophthalmic pathology but with predictors of myopia development.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated objective accommodative parameters using computer accommodography in samples of individuals aged 17-19 and 20-23 years with and without a diagnosis of myopia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on a random sample of young working-age individuals (aged 17-19 and 20-23 years) residing in Arkhangelsk. The sample included 210 individuals (420 eyes). All participants underwent a standard ophthalmological examination with diagnosis established in accordance with ICD-10, as well as an assessment of accommodative function using objective computer accommodography with subsequent analysis of accommodograms.
RESULTS: The main accommodogram indicators in individuals without ophthalmic pathology and with a normal accommodative response were calculated for the 17-19 and 20-23 age groups. Data were obtained on the ranges of accommodography indicators in individuals without ophthalmic pathology in the combined 17-23-year age group. Statistically significant differences were identified in the accommodative response stability coefficient (σARS) in individuals without ophthalmic pathology but at risk of developing computer vision syndrome.
CONCLUSION: Thus, in order to standardize accommodogram results in individuals without ophthalmic pathology and with a normal accommodative response, it is recommended to consider the combined age group of 17-23 years. At the same time, the σARS parameter may be recommended for identifying individuals without ophthalmic pathology but with predictors of myopia development.