Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2022
Relationships between contrast-enhanced computed tomography features of hard palate cancer and pathological depth of invasion.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baba Akira, Kurokawa Ryo, Kurokawa Mariko, McHugh Jonathan B, Hines Cisley, Ota Yoshiaki, Srinivasan Ashok
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the relationships between contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) features of hard palate cancer (radiological depth of invasion [r-DOI], detectability of the lesion, and tumor invasion into the palatal bone) and the pathological DOI (p-DOI) of the tumors.
STUDY DESIGN: In total, 36 lesions were retrospectively evaluated by 2 board-certified radiologists, who examined CECT scans for the radiological features, and 2 board-certified pathologists, who measured the p-DOI on histopathologic sections. Correlation between r-DOI and p-DOI was calculated. The Youden index was used to calculate the optimal p-DOI cutoff values to distinguish between detectable and undetectable lesions and between tumors with and without bony structure invasion.
RESULTS: There was excellent agreement between r-DOI and p-DOI (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.80). The p-DOI of CECT-detectable lesions was significantly greater than that of CECT-undetectable lesions (P < .001), with a p-DOI cutoff value of 4 mm. The p-DOI of lesions that had invaded the palatal bone was significantly larger than that of lesions without invasion (P = .039), with a p-DOI cutoff value of 7 mm.
CONCLUSION: Radiological DOI, tumor detectability, and invasion into the palatal bone can be useful in planning surgical treatment strategies for hard palate cancer.
STUDY DESIGN: In total, 36 lesions were retrospectively evaluated by 2 board-certified radiologists, who examined CECT scans for the radiological features, and 2 board-certified pathologists, who measured the p-DOI on histopathologic sections. Correlation between r-DOI and p-DOI was calculated. The Youden index was used to calculate the optimal p-DOI cutoff values to distinguish between detectable and undetectable lesions and between tumors with and without bony structure invasion.
RESULTS: There was excellent agreement between r-DOI and p-DOI (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.80). The p-DOI of CECT-detectable lesions was significantly greater than that of CECT-undetectable lesions (P < .001), with a p-DOI cutoff value of 4 mm. The p-DOI of lesions that had invaded the palatal bone was significantly larger than that of lesions without invasion (P = .039), with a p-DOI cutoff value of 7 mm.
CONCLUSION: Radiological DOI, tumor detectability, and invasion into the palatal bone can be useful in planning surgical treatment strategies for hard palate cancer.