Medical education · 2000
Differences in teaching about the acute sore throat within one medical faculty.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brooker C, Kamien M, Ward A M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To examine the consistency of teaching about the acute sore throat in four departments in one medical faculty, and to determine whether there is agreement between what is taught and the evidence-based literature.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SUBJECTS: 71 undergraduates and 15 postgraduate general practice registrars and four lecturers.
RESULTS: Differences were identified in teaching about the diagnostic value of a throat swab, a full blood count and clinical scoring, as well as on the use of penicillin in suspected streptococcal pharyngitis. Only one department based their teaching on the evidence-based literature. No department discussed issues of cost-effectiveness. Half of the students identified discrepancies in the teaching about the sore throat and were initially confused by them.
CONCLUSION: One method of resolving disagreement between teachers from different disciplines is to rely on the evidence-based literature. This type of study can be useful in curricular development and in correcting teaching inconsistencies within a faculty.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SUBJECTS: 71 undergraduates and 15 postgraduate general practice registrars and four lecturers.
RESULTS: Differences were identified in teaching about the diagnostic value of a throat swab, a full blood count and clinical scoring, as well as on the use of penicillin in suspected streptococcal pharyngitis. Only one department based their teaching on the evidence-based literature. No department discussed issues of cost-effectiveness. Half of the students identified discrepancies in the teaching about the sore throat and were initially confused by them.
CONCLUSION: One method of resolving disagreement between teachers from different disciplines is to rely on the evidence-based literature. This type of study can be useful in curricular development and in correcting teaching inconsistencies within a faculty.