Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2020
Clinical trial to evaluate the therapeutic benefits of limbal-supported contact lens wear for ocular sequelae due to Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Itoi Motohiro, Ueta Mayumi, Ogino Ken, Sumi Eriko, Imai Kojiro, Teramukai Satoshi, Kinoshita Shigeru, Sotozono Chie
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To analyze the therapeutic benefits of limbal-supported contact lens (CL) wear in patients with ocular sequelae due to Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).
METHODS: This interventional study enrolled 10 chronic SJS/TEN eyes with a spectacle best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of between 0.01 and 0.7 that were fitted with a limbal-supported CL. At baseline and at after 3-months CL use, CL-wear BCVA and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) scores were measured, and then compared. Incidence rates and severities of adverse events were also analyzed.
RESULTS: At after 3-months CL use, BCVA with the fitted CL significantly improved compared to that with spectacle correction at baseline (LogMAR: 0.76-0.15) (P = 0.0039), all NEI VFQ-25 scores improved, however, only in ocular pain and mental health showed statistically significant improvement (P = 0.0078 and 0.0039). No serious adverse events were observed during the follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Wearing of the limbal-supported CL improved vision compared to spectacles and reduced ocular pain in patients with ocular sequelae due to SJS/TEN.
METHODS: This interventional study enrolled 10 chronic SJS/TEN eyes with a spectacle best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of between 0.01 and 0.7 that were fitted with a limbal-supported CL. At baseline and at after 3-months CL use, CL-wear BCVA and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) scores were measured, and then compared. Incidence rates and severities of adverse events were also analyzed.
RESULTS: At after 3-months CL use, BCVA with the fitted CL significantly improved compared to that with spectacle correction at baseline (LogMAR: 0.76-0.15) (P = 0.0039), all NEI VFQ-25 scores improved, however, only in ocular pain and mental health showed statistically significant improvement (P = 0.0078 and 0.0039). No serious adverse events were observed during the follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Wearing of the limbal-supported CL improved vision compared to spectacles and reduced ocular pain in patients with ocular sequelae due to SJS/TEN.