Sleep medicine in otolaryngology units: an international survey.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cammaroto Giovanni, Bianchi Giulia, Zhang Henry, Veer Vik, Kotecha Bhik, Jacobowitz Ofer, Llatas Marina Carrasco, de Apodaca Paula Martínez Ruiz, Lugo Rodolfo, Meccariello Giuseppe, Iannella Giannicola, Gobbi Riccardo, Toh Song Tar, Hsu Ying-Shuo, Baghat Ahmed Yassin, Lechien Jerome R, Calvo-Henriquez Christian, Chiesa-Estomba Carlos, Barillari Maria Rosaria, Ibrahim Badr, Ayad Tareck, Fakhry Nicolas, Hoff Paul, Thuler Eric Rodrigues, Chan Lyndon, Kastoer Chloe, Ravesloot Madeline, De Vito Andrea, Montevecchi Filippo, Vicini Claudio
Аннотация
METHODS: An international online survey was developed with the collaboration of the YO-IFOS (Young Otolaryngologists-International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies) to assess the current practice of otolaryngologists in the management of sleep disorders. The survey also included a session dedicated to training.
RESULTS: A total of 126 otolaryngologists completed the survey. The larger part of responses was collected from Central/South America and Europe. The majority of responders from South/Central America (97%) declared to be certified as sleep specialist while 49% of Europeans stated the opposite. Of responders 83% perform a drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) before planning a possible surgical intervention. Soft palate and base of tongue interventions were the most common procedure, respectively performed in 94% and 79% of the cases. Residents were allowed to perform soft palate surgery in 77% of the cases. Upper airway stimulation (26% vs 10%), trans-oral robotic surgery (36% vs 11%) and radiofrequency of the base of the tongue (58% vs 25%) were preferred more frequently by European responders. The highest caseloads of soft palate surgery and bi-maxillary advancement were registered in the academic institutions.
CONCLUSION: Significant concordance and few interesting divergences in diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders were observed between nationalities and types of institution. Economic resources might have played a significant role in the therapeutic choice. Trainees' lack of exposure to certain interventions and to a sufficient caseload appeared to be the main burden to overcome.