Journal of prosthodontic research · 2020
Computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws - An in vivo feasibility study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hack Gary, Liberman Leila, Vach Kirstin, Tchorz Joerg P, Kohal Ralf J, Patzelt Sebastian B M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Within the specialty of prosthodontics, oral impressions are ubiquitous tools utilized to transfer intraoral characteristics such as teeth, implants, and soft tissue into a physical state (stone cast) that is processable in a laboratory setting for the fabrication of dental restorations. In recent years, optical impression systems have become ubiquitous in clinical practice replacing the conventional method of impression making. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws in an in vivo setting.
METHODS: 29 edentulous patients (27 maxillae and five mandibles) underwent conventional impressions as well as computerized optical impressions. The conventional impressions and the resulting stone casts were digitized and superimposed over the computerized/digitized optical impressions in order to obtain information on differences between the two datasets. Statistical analyses were performed to identify relevant deviations.
RESULTS: The overall mean difference between the stone cast, digital scans and the computerized optical scans were 336.7 ± 105.0 µm (n = 32), 363.7 ± 143.1 µm (n = 24), and 272.1 ± 168.5 µm (n = 29), respectively. The visual evaluations revealed highest deviations (≥ 500 µm) in the areas of the soft palate, the sublingual areas, and the vestibule (peripheral seal zone).
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, the investigated scanners were not able currently to fully replace a conventional impression for the fabrication of a complete denture.
METHODS: 29 edentulous patients (27 maxillae and five mandibles) underwent conventional impressions as well as computerized optical impressions. The conventional impressions and the resulting stone casts were digitized and superimposed over the computerized/digitized optical impressions in order to obtain information on differences between the two datasets. Statistical analyses were performed to identify relevant deviations.
RESULTS: The overall mean difference between the stone cast, digital scans and the computerized optical scans were 336.7 ± 105.0 µm (n = 32), 363.7 ± 143.1 µm (n = 24), and 272.1 ± 168.5 µm (n = 29), respectively. The visual evaluations revealed highest deviations (≥ 500 µm) in the areas of the soft palate, the sublingual areas, and the vestibule (peripheral seal zone).
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, the investigated scanners were not able currently to fully replace a conventional impression for the fabrication of a complete denture.