European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2017
Avoidance of the vaginal incision site for mesh placement in vaginal wall prolapse surgery: A prospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Robichaud Alfred, Bélanger Mathieu, Poirier Martine, Cloutier Frank, Gaudet Jeffrey, Jose Caroline
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy of a minimal surface area, vaginally-installed polypropylene tape (VPT), avoiding insertion on the incision line to treat an anterior, posterior or anteroposterior vaginal wall prolapse.
STUDY DESIGN: Patients with an anterior, posterior or anteroposterior vaginal wall prolapse waiting for surgical treatment were included in the study. Primary outcome was the incidence of prolapse recurrence reported with combined outcome measures and was reported with Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence. Secondary outcomes were operative complications, adverse events, urinary, colorectal and sexual functions as well as quality of life. Participation in the study involved up to 8 visits over 5 years. At each visit, patients used a self-reported questionnaire to report symptoms related to pain, urinary, colorectal, sexual functions, and quality of life. A physical examination was also performed. Paired t-tests were used to investigate change in POP-Q and quality of life measurements since baseline.
RESULTS: 71 patients underwent the procedure and were followed-up for an average (standard deviation) of 32.5 (18.7) months. Only 2 (2.8%) women experienced a recurrence of their pelvic organ prolapse. Only one case of erosion and no case of persistent pain have been recorded up to 5 years post-surgery. Quality of life was improved and then sustained throughout the follow-up period (p<0.01).
CONCLUSION: This VPT surgical procedure is safe and has a high level of efficacy to treat anterior, posterior or anteroposterior vaginal wall prolapse. It is also associated with improvements in quality of life of patients which are sustained for many years.
STUDY DESIGN: Patients with an anterior, posterior or anteroposterior vaginal wall prolapse waiting for surgical treatment were included in the study. Primary outcome was the incidence of prolapse recurrence reported with combined outcome measures and was reported with Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence. Secondary outcomes were operative complications, adverse events, urinary, colorectal and sexual functions as well as quality of life. Participation in the study involved up to 8 visits over 5 years. At each visit, patients used a self-reported questionnaire to report symptoms related to pain, urinary, colorectal, sexual functions, and quality of life. A physical examination was also performed. Paired t-tests were used to investigate change in POP-Q and quality of life measurements since baseline.
RESULTS: 71 patients underwent the procedure and were followed-up for an average (standard deviation) of 32.5 (18.7) months. Only 2 (2.8%) women experienced a recurrence of their pelvic organ prolapse. Only one case of erosion and no case of persistent pain have been recorded up to 5 years post-surgery. Quality of life was improved and then sustained throughout the follow-up period (p<0.01).
CONCLUSION: This VPT surgical procedure is safe and has a high level of efficacy to treat anterior, posterior or anteroposterior vaginal wall prolapse. It is also associated with improvements in quality of life of patients which are sustained for many years.