[High resolution for all in the clinics área of a Urology Department].

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of a one-stop clinic in terms of proportion of diagnostic-therapeutic orientation during 2013.

METHODS

All patients were referred from primary care facilities in the district of Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain (population 221.705). Previously, referral protocols were agreed. Seven senior urologists participated. 6674 referrals (January-December 2013) were eligible.

RESULTS

4534 referrals (4535/6674, 68%) were eventually evaluable. Patients taking advantage of the one-stop format were significantly younger than those needing extra consultations (chi2<0,001). Overall, reasons for consultation clearly affected the feasibility of the one-stop approach (chi2<0.001), the one-stop policy being substantiated in most consultations due to subfertility (89.4%), male sexual dysfunction (89.2%), testicular complains (88.3%) and other male genital complains (80.3%). On the contrary, extra consultations were the rule for degenerative diseases of the urinary tract (45%), malignancy (57%) and renal colic pain or urinary lithiasis (63.2%). No relationships could be identified between the referral centre and the feasibility of the one-stop approach (p=ns). The multivariate analysis confirmed the independent effect of the health problem (p<0.001) and patient age (p<0002) on the chances of having a successful one-stop approach.

CONCLUSIONS

a one-stop philosophy should be the standard for all patients in urology clinics.