Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2003
Cumulative delivery rates after ICSI treatment cycles with freshly retrieved testicular sperm: a 7-year follow-up study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Osmanagaoglu Kaan, Vernaeve Valerie, Kolibianakis Efstratios, Tournaye Herman, Camus Michel, Van Steirteghem Andre, Devroey Paul
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess cumulative delivery rates in patients with non-obstructive or obstructive azoospermia following treatment by testicular sperm extraction (TESE)-ICSI.
METHODS: A cohort follow-up study was conducted. Between January 1994 and December 2000, 364 couples with obstructive azoospermia underwent a total of 609 fresh TESE-ICSI treatment cycles. In addition, 303 fresh TESE-ICSI treatment cycles were performed in 235 couples for non-obstructive azoospermia. This study included only patients in whom sperm was recovered. In the non-obstructive group, only patients with maturation arrest, atrophic sclerosis and germ cell aplasia were included. The main outcome measure was a delivery beyond 25 weeks gestation.
RESULTS: In patients with obstructive azoospermia, the crude delivery rate after three cycles was 35% while the expected cumulative delivery rate was 48% [95% confidence interval (CI), 41-55]. On the other hand, in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, the crude cumulative delivery rate after three treatment cycles was 17% while the expected delivery rate was 31% (95% CI, 15-46). A high dropout rate in couples with both non-obstructive and obstructive azoospermia was observed (75 and 50% respectively, after the first cycle).
CONCLUSION: This study shows that there is a value in performing several TESE-ICSI attempts in patients with obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. The estimates of the non-obstructive group beginning from the third cycle are less reliable due to fewer patients. However, overall, the obstructive group performed better than the non-obstructive group.
METHODS: A cohort follow-up study was conducted. Between January 1994 and December 2000, 364 couples with obstructive azoospermia underwent a total of 609 fresh TESE-ICSI treatment cycles. In addition, 303 fresh TESE-ICSI treatment cycles were performed in 235 couples for non-obstructive azoospermia. This study included only patients in whom sperm was recovered. In the non-obstructive group, only patients with maturation arrest, atrophic sclerosis and germ cell aplasia were included. The main outcome measure was a delivery beyond 25 weeks gestation.
RESULTS: In patients with obstructive azoospermia, the crude delivery rate after three cycles was 35% while the expected cumulative delivery rate was 48% [95% confidence interval (CI), 41-55]. On the other hand, in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, the crude cumulative delivery rate after three treatment cycles was 17% while the expected delivery rate was 31% (95% CI, 15-46). A high dropout rate in couples with both non-obstructive and obstructive azoospermia was observed (75 and 50% respectively, after the first cycle).
CONCLUSION: This study shows that there is a value in performing several TESE-ICSI attempts in patients with obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. The estimates of the non-obstructive group beginning from the third cycle are less reliable due to fewer patients. However, overall, the obstructive group performed better than the non-obstructive group.