MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00006123-199710000-00032

Медицинская библиотека · Neurosurgery · 1997

Direct clip obliteration of a ruptured giant aneurysm of the posterior communicating artery: case report.

Matsumoto K, Kuriyama M, Tamiya T, Ohmoto T

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE AND

IMPORTANCE

A review of the literature documents that giant posterior communicating artery (PCoA) aneurysms are rare. To our knowledge, this report is the first to describe a ruptured giant aneurysm arising from a PCoA that was successfully clipped.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 27-year-old man had a left oculomotor palsy and then suffered a subarachnoid hemorrhage. Cerebral angiography and three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography revealed a giant fusiform aneurysm of the left PCoA. These imaging techniques documented the rapid growth of the aneurysm from a moderate to a giant size in fewer than 3 days.

INTERVENTION: The patient underwent a left subtemporal craniotomy. The neck was constructed and was successfully clipped, and the PCoA was reconstructed with five sequentially placed fenestrated clips in a tandem fashion. The patient experienced a good recovery.

CONCLUSION

This report describes the usefulness of three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography in planning the surgical approach to giant aneurysms originating from the PCoA and the use of fenestrated clips to obliterate giant fusiform aneurysms.

Для цитирования: Matsumoto K, Kuriyama M, Tamiya T, Ohmoto T. Direct clip obliteration of a ruptured giant aneurysm of the posterior communicating artery: case report.. Neurosurgery. 1997. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199710000-00032.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.