MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/falgy.2025.1635274

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in allergy · 2025

Prevalence of shrimp allergy: a meta-analysis based on different diagnostic methods.

Chen Jiaqi, Zhang Qiang, Ying Yongli, Zhang Xuying, Qu Chunsheng

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Shrimp allergy (SA) represents a significant public health concern, yet its overall prevalence remains unclear.

METHOD: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase through September 30, 2024 identified 40 studies that reported SA prevalence using self-reported symptoms, physician diagnosis, skin prick tests, specific IgE, or food challenge tests.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence was estimated at 1.90% for self-reported symptomatic SA and 1.94% for self-reported physician-diagnosed SA, while testing via skin prick or specific IgE yielded a prevalence of 2.76%. Notably, symptomatic testing showed a lower prevalence of 0.43%, and food challenge tests confirmed a prevalence of 0.50%. Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies, with prevalence varying by region and age group, and no publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that the prevalence of SA varies with diagnostic criteria, age, and region, underscoring the need for harmonized diagnostic standards to improve prevalence estimates and guide public health strategies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: identifier [CRD420251003956].

Для цитирования: Chen Jiaqi, Zhang Qiang, Ying Yongli, Zhang Xuying, Qu Chunsheng. Prevalence of shrimp allergy: a meta-analysis based on different diagnostic methods.. Frontiers in allergy. 2025. DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1635274.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.