Whole Blood Administration: Comparison of In Vitro Platelet Function of Pressure Bag, Pressure Bag With Fluid Warming Device, and Rapid Infuser Methods.

BACKGROUND

Use of low-titer group O whole blood for emergent transfusion of patients with unknown blood type became AABB approved in January 2018. Since that time, there is increasing use of whole blood in massive transfusion protocols. Whole blood stored at refrigerator temperature (2-4 °C) contains functional platelets that some research proposes may provide better clot dynamics than standard platelets, which are stored at room temperature (20-24 °C). Conventional teaching does not promote infusion of platelet products with pressure or warming, due to concerns of activation and subsequent inactivity of the infused platelets. Although a few reports found no significant changes in platelet function with warming or pressure during infusion of conventional room-temperature-stored platelets, there is limited data to support use of warming or pressure for infusion of whole blood products containing cold-stored platelets.

METHODS

This study design is to evaluate and compare three commonly used methods of administering blood products in a massive transfusion setting for their potential effects on platelets contained within whole blood units (pressure bag alone, pressure bag with fluid warming line, and rapid infuser).

RESULTS

Platelet function of 10 units tested pre- and post-infusion by thromboelastography (TEG) and platelet aggregation studies found no significant difference in platelet activity pre- and post-infusion with any of the three methods evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the use of rapid infuser or pressure bag devices (with or without warming) as acceptable for infusion of whole blood products. Infusion of whole blood with warming is preferable to prevent potential transfusion-associated hypothermia.