Biomedical sciences instrumentation · 2025
UTILITY OF CHEST ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN QUANTIFYING CLOT AND PLEURAL EFFUSION VOLUME IN PRECLINICAL MODELS OF PLEURAL DISEASE.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
De Vera Christian J, Jacob Jincy, Christudas Sunil, Sarva Krishna, Bailey Elizabeth V, Komissarov Andrey A, Azghani Ali O, Idell Steven, Florova Galina
Аннотация
Early detection and monitoring of pleural disease is critical in guiding appropriate treatment decisions. In the United States, chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) are the most employed imaging techniques to assess pleural disease for diagnosis and management. However, repeated imaging using these modalities exposes patients to cumulative ionizing radiation. In contrast, chest ultrasonography offers a safer, cost-effective, and portable alternative that could be of advantage to pediatric, rural, or resource-limited hospital settings. In addition, ultrasonography brings great utility to preclinical research where advanced imaging is limited. In this study, we developed and validated an ultrasound-based tool that enabled pleural effusion and clot volume quantification in our preclinical models of disease (early-stage empyema, advanced-stage empyema, and retained hemothorax). Four methods were tested for estimating pleural effusion and of the two of these most accurate methods were used to quantify clot volume. Across three animal models of pleural disease, both the Predicted Pleural Effusion and Clot Volume (mL) were closest to the actual volume (gold standard, mL) when area volumetry (pleural effusion or clot) was conducted in the coronal view of the pleural space of the subjects. Lastly, ultrasonographic imaging was able to distinguish the difference in clot dissolution (Predicted Clot Volume, mL) between subjects treated with vehicle control or fibrinolytic therapy, providing evidence of its utility in our preclinical model. These findings support the potential applications of these volumetric tools for preclinical and potential clinical use.