Cornea · 2016
Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A Systematic Immunofluorescence Study of Collagen Type VIII Suggests Heterogeneous Pathophysiology.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nielsen Esben, Nielsen Kim, Ivarsen Anders, Greenhill Nicholas S, Davis Paul F, Hjortdal Jesper
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the pathophysiologic heterogeneity of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).
METHODS: We conducted a systematic immunofluorescence study on 39 Descemet membrane samples from FECD patients and compared these with 10 Descemet membrane samples from patients with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) and 7 normal corneas. Samples were analyzed with immunofluorescence using antibodies to the α1-chain [collagen VIII α1-chain (COL8A1)] and α2-chain (COL8A2). Intensity of staining was assessed using a subjective grading scale from 0 to 3. The presence of specific staining patterns was noted.
RESULTS: The overall distribution of COL8A1 staining intensity between groups was significantly different (P = 0.002). There was marked/intense staining in 85% (33/39) of the FECD samples, 40% (4/10) of the PBK samples (P = 0.034), and 29% (2/7) of normal samples (P = 0.004). The overall distribution of COL8A2 staining intensity was not significantly different between groups (P = 0.39). There was marked/intense staining in 33% (13/39) of the FECD samples, 10% (1/10) of PBK samples, and 14% (1/7) of the normal samples. There was substantial variation in staining intensity in the FECD group, a phenomenon that was especially pronounced for the COL8A2 antibody.
CONCLUSIONS: We found increased staining for COL8A1, but not COL8A2 in FECD samples. Further, there was striking variation of staining intensity in FECD patients, indicating pathophysiological heterogeneity.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic immunofluorescence study on 39 Descemet membrane samples from FECD patients and compared these with 10 Descemet membrane samples from patients with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) and 7 normal corneas. Samples were analyzed with immunofluorescence using antibodies to the α1-chain [collagen VIII α1-chain (COL8A1)] and α2-chain (COL8A2). Intensity of staining was assessed using a subjective grading scale from 0 to 3. The presence of specific staining patterns was noted.
RESULTS: The overall distribution of COL8A1 staining intensity between groups was significantly different (P = 0.002). There was marked/intense staining in 85% (33/39) of the FECD samples, 40% (4/10) of the PBK samples (P = 0.034), and 29% (2/7) of normal samples (P = 0.004). The overall distribution of COL8A2 staining intensity was not significantly different between groups (P = 0.39). There was marked/intense staining in 33% (13/39) of the FECD samples, 10% (1/10) of PBK samples, and 14% (1/7) of the normal samples. There was substantial variation in staining intensity in the FECD group, a phenomenon that was especially pronounced for the COL8A2 antibody.
CONCLUSIONS: We found increased staining for COL8A1, but not COL8A2 in FECD samples. Further, there was striking variation of staining intensity in FECD patients, indicating pathophysiological heterogeneity.