MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/prs.0000000000012033

Медицинская библиотека · Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025

One-Year Outcomes in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction.

Vingan Perri S, Kim Minji, Boe Lillian A, Coriddi Michelle R, Allen Robert J, Disa Joseph J, Stern Carrie S, Matros Evan, Mehrara Babak J, Nelson Jonas A

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Prepectoral and subpectoral approaches to implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) are both reliable options after mastectomy. In this study, the authors compared 1-year complication rates, additional or revision procedures, and patient-reported outcomes between 2-stage prepectoral or subpectoral IBBR through propensity matching.

METHODS

Female patients who underwent prepectoral or subpectoral 2-stage IBBR from January of 2017 to June of 2022 with BREAST-Q scores available 1 year after exchange were reviewed. Complication rates, additional or revision procedures at the time of exchange and within 1 year of exchange, and BREAST-Q scores preoperatively and at 1 year were compared between patient groups. Propensity score-matched analyses were used to reduce possible confounding or selection bias related to nonrandomized treatment assignment of patients.

RESULTS

Of 1732 overall patients, 878 patients were included in the matched analysis (439 in each cohort). Patients with prepectoral IBBR had significantly higher rates of implant-related cellulitis or infection (5.5% versus 1.8%; P = 0.008) and implant exposure (2.3% versus 0.2%; P = 0.016) compared with patients with subpectoral IBBR, and more commonly had fat grafting at the time of the exchange procedure. On BREAST-Q, Physical Well-Being of the Chest at 1 year was significantly higher in the patients with prepectoral IBBR (median, 80 [interquartile range, 64, 92] versus 76 [64, 85]; P < 0.001). No other differences in BREAST-Q outcomes were observed.

CONCLUSION

In this powered analysis comparing prepectoral and subpectoral implant reconstruction at 1 year, the authors found that patients with prepectoral IBBR experienced higher rates of complications, such as infection or implant exposure, after implant exchange but had improved health-related quality of life as defined by the BREAST-Q Physical Well-Being of the Chest domain.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Для цитирования: Vingan Perri S, Kim Minji, Boe Lillian A, Coriddi Michelle R, Allen Robert J, Disa Joseph J, Stern Carrie S, Matros Evan, Mehrara Babak J, Nelson Jonas A. One-Year Outcomes in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000012033.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.