MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1742731

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026

A prospective cohort study on the incidence and influencing factors of subsyndromal delirium in ICU patients.

Li Ying, Huang Jieling, Wang Xiuhong, Pan Yuefei

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning-based risk prediction model for subsyndromal delirium (SSD) in ICU patients, while identifying key risk factors.

METHOD: This study was a prospective study, selecting patients who were hospitalized in the ICU from October 2024 to May 2025. We compared seven machine learning algorithms: Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Elastic Network (EN), Extreme Gradient Enhancement (XGB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM).

RESULT: In our study, the prevalence rate of SSD was 37.158%. The comparative analysis shows that XGB is the best predictive model (AUC = 0.84). Feature importance analysis identified four significant predictive factors: Use of vasoactive drugs (0.412), Monthly household income (0.306), Undergone surgery (0.191) and Number of Medications (0.036).

CONCLUSION

The prediction model based on XGB has a good effect in identifying the risk of SSD in ICU patients. These findings enable clinicians to stratify high-risk groups and implement timely and targeted intervention measures, effectively reducing the risk of adverse consequences. Future multicenter studies should validate these results in larger cohorts.

Для цитирования: Li Ying, Huang Jieling, Wang Xiuhong, Pan Yuefei. A prospective cohort study on the incidence and influencing factors of subsyndromal delirium in ICU patients.. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1742731.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.