World journal of experimental medicine · 2025
Haematology results, inflammatory haematological ratios, and inflammatory indices in cervical cancer: How is the difference between cancer stage?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liana Phey, Syahbiran Hanif Gusneri, Sari Nurmalia Purnama, Rahadiyanto Kemas Yakub, Nurwany Raissa, Nurhidayat Wahyudi, Umar Tungki Pratama
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a prevalent form of cancer affecting women worldwide and it is the second most common cancer among women in Indonesia, accounting for 8.5% of all cancer-related deaths. Cervical cancer progression can be evaluated through laboratory tests to detect anaemia, an increased platelet count, and elevated inflammatory markers, therefore, effective laboratory examination is crucial for early detection and treatment of cervical cancer.
AIM: To evaluate the association between laboratory findings (haematology, haematology index, and inflammatory index) and the clinical stage of cervical cancer.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed adult cervical cancer patients' data from medical records and laboratory results including sociodemographic status, histopathological finding, clinical stage, and complete haematology examination. Numerical data was analyzed by the one-way ANOVA (normal data distribution), while the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for non-parametric data (abnormal distribution), followed by appropriate post-hoc analysis. The categorical data was analyzed by the Chi-square or Fisher Exact tests. The significance level was established at a P value < 0.05.
RESULTS: This study involved the data of 208 adult cervical cancer patients and found no association between age, marital history, parity history, hormonal contraceptive use and cervical cancer stages. There were significant differences in the clinical laboratory test results based on the clinical stage of cervical cancer, including haemoglobin levels (P < 0.001), leucocytes (P < 0.001), neutrophils (P < 0.001), monocytes (P = 0.002), lymphocytes (P = 0.006), platelets (P < 0.001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio/NLR (P < 0.001), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio/LMR (P < 0.001), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio/PLR (P < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the systemic inflammatory index (SII) and systematic inflammatory response index (SIRI) between stage III + IV cervical cancer and stage II (SII P < 0.001; SIRI P = 0.001) and stage I (SII P < 0.001; SIRI P = 0.016), associated with the shifts in previously mentioned complete haematological values with cancer advancement.
CONCLUSION: The haematological parameters, inflammatory haematological ratios, and inflammatory indices exhibited significant differences between cervical cancer stages, therefore these tests can be utilized to evaluate cervical cancer progression.
AIM: To evaluate the association between laboratory findings (haematology, haematology index, and inflammatory index) and the clinical stage of cervical cancer.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed adult cervical cancer patients' data from medical records and laboratory results including sociodemographic status, histopathological finding, clinical stage, and complete haematology examination. Numerical data was analyzed by the one-way ANOVA (normal data distribution), while the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for non-parametric data (abnormal distribution), followed by appropriate post-hoc analysis. The categorical data was analyzed by the Chi-square or Fisher Exact tests. The significance level was established at a P value < 0.05.
RESULTS: This study involved the data of 208 adult cervical cancer patients and found no association between age, marital history, parity history, hormonal contraceptive use and cervical cancer stages. There were significant differences in the clinical laboratory test results based on the clinical stage of cervical cancer, including haemoglobin levels (P < 0.001), leucocytes (P < 0.001), neutrophils (P < 0.001), monocytes (P = 0.002), lymphocytes (P = 0.006), platelets (P < 0.001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio/NLR (P < 0.001), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio/LMR (P < 0.001), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio/PLR (P < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the systemic inflammatory index (SII) and systematic inflammatory response index (SIRI) between stage III + IV cervical cancer and stage II (SII P < 0.001; SIRI P = 0.001) and stage I (SII P < 0.001; SIRI P = 0.016), associated with the shifts in previously mentioned complete haematological values with cancer advancement.
CONCLUSION: The haematological parameters, inflammatory haematological ratios, and inflammatory indices exhibited significant differences between cervical cancer stages, therefore these tests can be utilized to evaluate cervical cancer progression.