MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2008.tb00187.x

Медицинская библиотека · Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses · 2008

Myths and facts about safe patient handling in rehabilitation.

Nelson Audrey, Harwood Kenneth J, Tracey Catherine A, Dunn Kathleen L

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

As the incidence of injuries associated with patient-handling tasks remains high in the rehabilitation community, interdisciplinary discussions on optimal methods for preventing injuries and ensuring good care continue. A national task force consisting of representatives from the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses, the American Physical Therapy Association, and the Veterans Health Administration identified myths that have been promulgated on both sides of the discussion, focusing especially on rehabilitation practices. The purpose of this article is to dispel these myths by using evidence-based methods. Evidence should be applied in discussions of safe patient handling, and although concern about patient outcomes is critical, there is no evidence that the use of patient-handling technology undermines rehabilitation goals and strong evidence that these practices enhance the safety of rehabilitation care providers. Further research on the impact of safe patient-handling practices on rehabilitation goals and continued communication between rehabilitation providers are recommended.

Для цитирования: Nelson Audrey, Harwood Kenneth J, Tracey Catherine A, Dunn Kathleen L. Myths and facts about safe patient handling in rehabilitation.. Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses. 2008. DOI: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2008.tb00187.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.