MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/rap/rky050

Медицинская библиотека · Rheumatology advances in practice · 2018

Retroperitoneal fibrosis; a single-centre case experience with literature review.

Adnan Saqib, Bouraoui Aicha, Mehta Sampi, Banerjee Siwalik, Jain Shaifali, Dasgupta Bhaskar

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We present 13 patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis, focusing on clinical features, radiological characteristics, treatments and their outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the medical records was performed of all retroperitoneal fibrosis patients diagnosed and treated in our department between 2012 and 2017.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were male, with a median age of 64 years. Eleven patients presented with abdominal pain or back pain or both. Aetiologies varied from idiopathic to malignancy and vasculitis. Twelve patients had PET scans. These showed 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-avid retroperitoneal soft tissue around the abdominal aorta in the vast majority, with five scans also demonstrating localized or generalized uptake by the aorta. In all cases except one, glucocorticoids were applied as the first-line therapy. Further immunosuppressive therapy was required in 10 cases.

CONCLUSION

Our patients were male and older in age compared with the existing literature. PET scans were very helpful in diagnosis of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Rituximab was found to be an effective treatment in six of our patients.

Для цитирования: Adnan Saqib, Bouraoui Aicha, Mehta Sampi, Banerjee Siwalik, Jain Shaifali, Dasgupta Bhaskar. Retroperitoneal fibrosis; a single-centre case experience with literature review.. Rheumatology advances in practice. 2018. DOI: 10.1093/rap/rky050.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.