International journal of audiology · 2025
Comparing UK patients' experiences of NHS audiology care using a newly translated English version of the consumer quality index (CQI) 'audiology care' questionnaire.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Patel Perindi, Munro Kevin J, Parsons Jonathan O, Marsden Antonia, Heinrich Antje
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Following the adaptation of a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) of "Audiology Care", based on the Consumer Quality Index (CQI), from a Dutch to a UK context, we compared patient experiences of the prescription and fitting process for first-time adult hearing aid (HA) users in two different venues affiliated to the same organisation.
DESIGN: The adapted PREM consisted of 32 questions and 7 subscales.
STUDY SAMPLE: The PREM was posted to a group of 1821 NHS patients who had received a first HA fitting via a social enterprise within the past 12 months at either a Hospital or High Street venue. 967 (53%, 796 Hospital, 171 High Street) patients responded and were included in the study.
RESULTS: For two out of seven subscales the mean patient ratings for the two venues showed statistically significant differences: "Accommodation and Facilities" and "Waiting Times". In both cases the differences were very small. Internal consistency of subscales ranged from 0.36-0.81 with only three subscales showing good or acceptable values: "Conduct of Employees", "Expertise of Employees" and "Arranging Appointments".
CONCLUSION: This translated and adapted PREM can be a useful tool to standardise assessment and reporting of patient experiences of first-time HA users in the UK.
DESIGN: The adapted PREM consisted of 32 questions and 7 subscales.
STUDY SAMPLE: The PREM was posted to a group of 1821 NHS patients who had received a first HA fitting via a social enterprise within the past 12 months at either a Hospital or High Street venue. 967 (53%, 796 Hospital, 171 High Street) patients responded and were included in the study.
RESULTS: For two out of seven subscales the mean patient ratings for the two venues showed statistically significant differences: "Accommodation and Facilities" and "Waiting Times". In both cases the differences were very small. Internal consistency of subscales ranged from 0.36-0.81 with only three subscales showing good or acceptable values: "Conduct of Employees", "Expertise of Employees" and "Arranging Appointments".
CONCLUSION: This translated and adapted PREM can be a useful tool to standardise assessment and reporting of patient experiences of first-time HA users in the UK.