BMC oral health · 2025
Hyaluronic acid efficacy in root coverage procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Talebi Ardakani Mohammadreza, Moscowchi Anahita, Talebi Amir, Talebi Mohammad Hossein
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Treatment of gingival recessions through surgical approaches is a common periodontal intervention. There is a rise in using biologics in root coverage procedures. As it has been shown that hyaluronic acid (HA) promotes wound healing, this review aimed to assess its efficacy in the treatment of gingival recessions.
METHODS: An electronic search was conducted across several databases (Medline/ PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) supplemented by manual searching. The effectiveness of using HA was evaluated using various outcome measures, with the primary indicators being complete and mean coverage, recession depth, and recession width. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the differences between test and control sites.
RESULTS: A total of 9 studies were eligible for inclusion. The overall analysis showed no significant difference between coronally advanced flap (CAF) + HA and control groups (CAF alone or CAF + sub-epithelial connective tissue graft) in terms of mean root coverage with a mean difference of 8.23 (95% confidence interval -3.06 to 19.53) and p = 0.12.
CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that the local application of HA may have some slight benefits over CAF alone in certain parameters. Nevertheless, its application does not add significant benefits to connective tissue graft. Given the high heterogeneity among the studies, further research with extended follow-up periods is necessary to better understand the clinical implications of using hyaluronic acid in this context.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42024580649.
METHODS: An electronic search was conducted across several databases (Medline/ PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) supplemented by manual searching. The effectiveness of using HA was evaluated using various outcome measures, with the primary indicators being complete and mean coverage, recession depth, and recession width. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the differences between test and control sites.
RESULTS: A total of 9 studies were eligible for inclusion. The overall analysis showed no significant difference between coronally advanced flap (CAF) + HA and control groups (CAF alone or CAF + sub-epithelial connective tissue graft) in terms of mean root coverage with a mean difference of 8.23 (95% confidence interval -3.06 to 19.53) and p = 0.12.
CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that the local application of HA may have some slight benefits over CAF alone in certain parameters. Nevertheless, its application does not add significant benefits to connective tissue graft. Given the high heterogeneity among the studies, further research with extended follow-up periods is necessary to better understand the clinical implications of using hyaluronic acid in this context.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42024580649.