Brain and behavior · 2024
Can Residual Inhibition Predict the Success of Sound Enrichment Treatment for Tinnitus?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sendesen Eser, Turkyilmaz Didem
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate whether residual inhibition (RI), which provides information on the relationship between tinnitus and increased spontaneous activity in the auditory system, is a predictor for the success of sound enrichment treatment.
DESIGN: Tinnitus patients were divided into two groups based on whether RI was achieved (RI+) or not (RI-). All participants underwent sound enrichment. Psychosomatic measures (for tinnitus severity, discomfort, attention deficit and sleep difficulties), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), minimum masking level (MML), and tinnitus loudness level (TLL) results were compared before and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.
STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-seven chronic tinnitus patients were divided into two groups based on whether RI was achieved (RI+) or not (RI-). There were 38 patients in the RI+ group and 29 in the RI- group.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in psychosomatic measures, THI, MML and TLL scores at the post-treatment 6 months after treatment (p <.05). There was a statistically significant decrease in psychosomatic measures, THI, MML and TLL scores during the treatment period in the RI+ group, but not in the RI- group.
CONCLUSION: RI may predict the prognosis of tinnitus treatments used in clinics to reduce the spontaneous firing rate of neurons in the central auditory system, and that RI positivity may be a predictor of treatment success in sound enrichment.
DESIGN: Tinnitus patients were divided into two groups based on whether RI was achieved (RI+) or not (RI-). All participants underwent sound enrichment. Psychosomatic measures (for tinnitus severity, discomfort, attention deficit and sleep difficulties), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), minimum masking level (MML), and tinnitus loudness level (TLL) results were compared before and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.
STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-seven chronic tinnitus patients were divided into two groups based on whether RI was achieved (RI+) or not (RI-). There were 38 patients in the RI+ group and 29 in the RI- group.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in psychosomatic measures, THI, MML and TLL scores at the post-treatment 6 months after treatment (p <.05). There was a statistically significant decrease in psychosomatic measures, THI, MML and TLL scores during the treatment period in the RI+ group, but not in the RI- group.
CONCLUSION: RI may predict the prognosis of tinnitus treatments used in clinics to reduce the spontaneous firing rate of neurons in the central auditory system, and that RI positivity may be a predictor of treatment success in sound enrichment.