Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2022
Machine Learning for Vestibular Schwannoma Diagnosis Using Audiometrie Data Alone.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carey Grace E, Jacobson Clare E, Warburton Alyssa N, Biddle Elliot, Mannarelli Greg, Wilson Michael, Stucken Emily Z
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare machine learning algorithms and established rule-based evaluations in screening audiograms for the purpose of diagnosing vestibular schwannomas. A secondary aim is to assess the performance of rule-based evaluations for predicting vestibular schwannomas using the largest dataset in the literature.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
PATIENTS: Seven hundred sixty seven adult patients with confirmed vestibular schwannoma and a pretreatment audiogram on file and 2000 randomly selected adult controls with audiograms.
INTERVENTIONS: Audiometric data were analyzed using machine learning algorithms and standard rule-based criteria for defining asymmetric hearing loss.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is the ability to identify patients with vestibular schwannomas based on audiometric data alone, using machine learning algorithms and rule-based formulas. The secondary outcome is the application of conventional rule-based formulas to a larger dataset using advanced computational techniques.
RESULTS: The machine learning algorithms had mildly improved specificity in some fields compared with rule-based evaluations and had similar sensitivity to previous rule-based evaluations in diagnosis of vestibular schwannomas.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning algorithms perform similarly to rule-based evaluations in identifying patients with vestibular schwannomas based on audiometric data alone. Performance of established rule-based formulas was consistent with earlier performance metrics, when analyzed using a large dataset.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
PATIENTS: Seven hundred sixty seven adult patients with confirmed vestibular schwannoma and a pretreatment audiogram on file and 2000 randomly selected adult controls with audiograms.
INTERVENTIONS: Audiometric data were analyzed using machine learning algorithms and standard rule-based criteria for defining asymmetric hearing loss.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is the ability to identify patients with vestibular schwannomas based on audiometric data alone, using machine learning algorithms and rule-based formulas. The secondary outcome is the application of conventional rule-based formulas to a larger dataset using advanced computational techniques.
RESULTS: The machine learning algorithms had mildly improved specificity in some fields compared with rule-based evaluations and had similar sensitivity to previous rule-based evaluations in diagnosis of vestibular schwannomas.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning algorithms perform similarly to rule-based evaluations in identifying patients with vestibular schwannomas based on audiometric data alone. Performance of established rule-based formulas was consistent with earlier performance metrics, when analyzed using a large dataset.