MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00104-004-0880-2

Медицинская библиотека · Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2004

[Pitfalls of endoscopic carpal tunnel release].

Kretschmer T, Antoniadis G, Börm W, Richter H-P

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the causes of failed endoscopic carpal tunnel release (CTR) in order to detect potentially hazardous operative steps. The intraoperative findings of 10 microsurgically revised cases were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

From January 1999 to October 2001, ten patients underwent open revision surgery after being referred because of failed endoscopic carpal tunnel release (CTR). The median nerve had been injured in five cases, necessitating autologous sural nerve grafting in four. Two other patients underwent extensive (external and internal) neurolysis. The lesions were located twice in the main nerve trunk, three times in the recurrent motor branch, three times in a digital nerve, and once in the sensory palmar branch. The transverse carpal ligament (TCL) had not been sectioned in four cases and was incomplete in two. In another two cases, previously sectioned TCLs were closed again by firm fibrous tissue. In three cases, postoperative hematomas after the initial release were described and possibly contributed to symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic CTR in the hand of the inexperienced bears major risks for iatrogenic neurovascular injury.

Для цитирования: Kretschmer T, Antoniadis G, Börm W, Richter H-P. [Pitfalls of endoscopic carpal tunnel release].. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen. 2004. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-004-0880-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.