MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5507/bp.2018.020

Медицинская библиотека · Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2018

Extraction of a dislocated leadless pacemaker in a patient with infective endocarditis and repeated endocardial and epicardial pacing system infections.

Taborsky Milos, Skala Tomas, Kocher Martin, Fedorco Marian

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Leadless pacemakers (PMs) were recently introduced to address the complication rate of standard PMs with transvenous leads.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

A 34-year old male with a history of intravenous substance abuse and a chronic type C hepatitis developed a complete atrioventricular block after cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis. Repeatedly, endo- and epi-cardially implanted PMs had to be explanted due to infection. A leadless MICRA pacemaker was successfully implanted with a dislocation into pulmonary artery several days after implantation. The PM was successfully retrieved using a single-loop retrieval snare guided by a steerable sheath. Subsequently, another Micra PM was successfully implanted with no further issues.

CONCLUSION

In the case of a Micra leadless pacemaker dislocation, a conventional gooseneck snare in combination with a steerable sheath can be used to retrieve the device, improving the overall safety of leadless pacemakers.

Для цитирования: Taborsky Milos, Skala Tomas, Kocher Martin, Fedorco Marian. Extraction of a dislocated leadless pacemaker in a patient with infective endocarditis and repeated endocardial and epicardial pacing system infections.. Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia. 2018. DOI: 10.5507/bp.2018.020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.