MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdv264

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2015

A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer.

O'Neil B H, Scott A J, Ma W W, Cohen S J, Aisner D L, Menter A R, Tejani M A, Cho J K, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure O O, Baranda J C, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen D J, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee A J, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes C L, Messersmith W A

Клиническое исследование II фазыКлиническое исследование III фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Rigosertib (ON 01910.Na), a first-in-class Ras mimetic and small-molecule inhibitor of multiple signaling pathways including polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), has shown efficacy in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. In this study, rigosertib was assessed in combination with gemcitabine in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle plus rigosertib 1800 mg/m(2) via 2-h continuous IV infusions given twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle (RIG + GEM) versus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle (GEM).

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were enrolled globally and randomly assigned to RIG + GEM (106 patients) or GEM (54). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (8% in the RIG + GEM group versus 6% in the GEM group), hyponatremia (17% versus 4%), and anemia (8% versus 4%). The median overall survival was 6.1 months for RIG + GEM versus 6.4 months for GEM [hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.81]. The median progression-free survival was 3.4 months for both groups (HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.68-1.36). The partial response rate was 19% versus 13% for RIG + GEM versus GEM, respectively. Of 64 tumor samples sent for molecular analysis, 47 were adequate for multiplex genetic testing and 41 were positive for mutations. The majority of cases had KRAS gene mutations (40 cases). Other mutations detected included TP53 (13 cases) and PIK3CA (1 case). No correlation between mutational status and efficacy was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of RIG + GEM failed to demonstrate an improvement in survival or response compared with GEM in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Rigosertib showed a similar safety profile to that seen in previous trials using the IV formulation.

Для цитирования: O'Neil B H, Scott A J, Ma W W, Cohen S J, Aisner D L, Menter A R, Tejani M A, Cho J K, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure O O, Baranda J C, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen D J, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee A J, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes C L, Messersmith W A. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer.. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2015. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv264.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.