MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10899-024-10324-4

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of gambling studies · 2024

Religiosity, Financial Risk Taking, and Reward Processing: An Experimental Study.

Vanheusden Frederique J, Vadapalli Sundara Kashyap, Rashid Mamunur, Griffiths Mark D, Kim Amee

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The present study investigated the extent to which financial risk-taking (FRT) perspectives and religiosity influenced an individual's performance on financial decision-making tasks under risk and/or uncertainty. It further investigated the potential to measure this interaction using electro-encephalogram (EEG) assessments through reward-related event-related potentials (P3 and FRN). EEG data were collected from 37 participants undergoing four decision-making tasks comprising the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), Iowa Gambling Test (IGT), Mixed-Gamble Loss-Aversion Task (MGLAT), and MGLA-Success Task (MGLAST). The present study found that BART performance may be affected by an interaction of FRT perspectives and religiosity. The physiological effects of task feedback were also distinguished between religious and non-religious individuals objectively with EEG data. Overall, while religiosity and FRT may not significantly influence IGT and MGLA performance, and interact with BART in a complex way, physiological reaction towards feedback after BART performance appears to be strongly affected by religiosity and FRT perspectives.

Для цитирования: Vanheusden Frederique J, Vadapalli Sundara Kashyap, Rashid Mamunur, Griffiths Mark D, Kim Amee. Religiosity, Financial Risk Taking, and Reward Processing: An Experimental Study.. Journal of gambling studies. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-024-10324-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.