MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/moo.0b013e32830ce796

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2008

Issues, indications, and controversies regarding intratympanic steroid perfusion.

Hamid Mohamed, Trune Dennis

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Office-based intratympanic inner ear steroid perfusion (ITPs) treatment for Ménière's disease, autoimmune inner ear disease, and sudden sensorineural hearing loss has been expanding over the past 10-15 years, yet remains controversial. The purpose of this review is to examine the current literature of basic science and human studies of ITPs treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS: Animal studies exist regarding the delivery, distribution, biochemical, and microbiological changes in the inner ear post ITPs. However, few clinical studies exist on ITPs treatment in sudden sensorineural hearing loss and even less in treating Ménière's disease. There are no consistent studies regarding drug delivery methods, type, and concentration of steroids. Moreover, there are no studies comparing ITPs results to the natural history of Ménière's disease.

SUMMARY: ITPs has impacted otology and neurotology practice due to increased utilization. A sound understanding of the basic science and clinical studies is needed to establish long-term efficacy of ITPs in controlling hearing loss in Ménière's disease by comparison to its natural history, as well as, potential application to other disorders.

Для цитирования: Hamid Mohamed, Trune Dennis. Issues, indications, and controversies regarding intratympanic steroid perfusion.. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1097/moo.0b013e32830ce796.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.