Cureus · 2025
A Longitudinal Study of Interprofessional Education Readiness and Collaboration Skills Among Japanese Psychology Undergraduates.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hase Ayako, Kawahito Junko, Tsuno Norifumi, Yokohira Masanao, Komasawa Nobuyasu, Kato Ikuko, Noguchi Shuji, Shinohara Tomomi, Tsuge Kaoru, Uematsu Miyuki, Takemori Motohiko, Kanbara Kenji
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Few longitudinal studies have examined the effects of interprofessional education (IPE), particularly those involving psychology students. In Japan, where national certification for psychologists was established in 2017, a common challenge faced by psychologists is the content and methods of IPE.
OBJECTIVE: A four-year longitudinal study was conducted to examine the sustained effects of first-year IPE within an undergraduate training program for licensed psychologists. In addition, a separate study investigated the changes in interprofessional work skills in a non-IPE practicum.
METHODS: This study employed a mixed-method research design combining (i) a longitudinal observational study (2020-2023) to examine the sustained effects of the IPE implemented in the 2020 academic year and (ii) a quasi-experimental pre-post test study independently conducted with the same participants in the 2023 academic year. The design was based on (i) Kolb's Experiential Learning Model and (ii) Schön's Reflective Practitioner Model, and one of the goals was to develop interprofessional work skills. The participants were students in a licensed psychologist training program who enrolled in 2020. We investigated their readiness for IPE (using the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS)) over a four-year period (primary evaluation) and interprofessional competency (using the Interprofessional Competency Assessment Scale for Undergraduates (ICASU)) before and after their fourth year of practice (secondary evaluation).
RESULTS: RIPLS scores from first to fourth year neither improved nor declined; ICASU scores increased from 56.00 (49.00-63.00) before the program to 63.00 (55.00-67.00) after the program (p = 0.005). On the subscales, "understanding one's own and other occupations" (p = 0.013) and "interprofessional collaboration skills" (p = 0.014) improved significantly. Regarding "basic communication skills," which did not improve significantly, the results of the item-by-item analysis showed that items related to recognizing diverse values (p = 0.008) and finding one's issues (p = 0.003) improved; however, four items, including assertive discussion skills, did not improve.
CONCLUSION: In the longitudinal survey, readiness for IPE did not decrease after the first year of IPE. This suggests that even without continuous IPE, readiness for IPE could be maintained, and the basic skills for interprofessional work could be developed by devising a curriculum and practice program.
OBJECTIVE: A four-year longitudinal study was conducted to examine the sustained effects of first-year IPE within an undergraduate training program for licensed psychologists. In addition, a separate study investigated the changes in interprofessional work skills in a non-IPE practicum.
METHODS: This study employed a mixed-method research design combining (i) a longitudinal observational study (2020-2023) to examine the sustained effects of the IPE implemented in the 2020 academic year and (ii) a quasi-experimental pre-post test study independently conducted with the same participants in the 2023 academic year. The design was based on (i) Kolb's Experiential Learning Model and (ii) Schön's Reflective Practitioner Model, and one of the goals was to develop interprofessional work skills. The participants were students in a licensed psychologist training program who enrolled in 2020. We investigated their readiness for IPE (using the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS)) over a four-year period (primary evaluation) and interprofessional competency (using the Interprofessional Competency Assessment Scale for Undergraduates (ICASU)) before and after their fourth year of practice (secondary evaluation).
RESULTS: RIPLS scores from first to fourth year neither improved nor declined; ICASU scores increased from 56.00 (49.00-63.00) before the program to 63.00 (55.00-67.00) after the program (p = 0.005). On the subscales, "understanding one's own and other occupations" (p = 0.013) and "interprofessional collaboration skills" (p = 0.014) improved significantly. Regarding "basic communication skills," which did not improve significantly, the results of the item-by-item analysis showed that items related to recognizing diverse values (p = 0.008) and finding one's issues (p = 0.003) improved; however, four items, including assertive discussion skills, did not improve.
CONCLUSION: In the longitudinal survey, readiness for IPE did not decrease after the first year of IPE. This suggests that even without continuous IPE, readiness for IPE could be maintained, and the basic skills for interprofessional work could be developed by devising a curriculum and practice program.