MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000018965

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2020

Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of quality and safety of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis treated by acupuncture: A protocol for a systematic review.

Li Lu, Hu Shouliang, Zhu Xin, Zhu Tianmin, Li Hui

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the quality and safety of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) treated by acupuncture.

METHODS

An extensive database search was executed to find the randomized controlled trials on acupuncture vs. sham acupuncture, and any other treatments for patients with CRS. Review Manager 5 (RevMan) was used for the data analysis. A strict methodology was used when the meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

This study systematically assesses the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in patients with CRS. The primary outcomes include health-related quality of life, disease severity, treatment-related adverse events. The secondary outcomes are comprised of recurrence rate, endoscopic score, computerized tomography (CT) scan score and objective physiological measures.

CONCLUSION

This article summarizes the current evidence base for the quality of life and safety of acupuncture in patients with CRS.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO (registration number CRD42018114432).

Для цитирования: Li Lu, Hu Shouliang, Zhu Xin, Zhu Tianmin, Li Hui. Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of quality and safety of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis treated by acupuncture: A protocol for a systematic review.. Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018965.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.