MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038258

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2020

Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence.

Karwatowska Lucy, Russell Simon, Solmi Francesca, De Stavola Bianca Lucia, Jaffee Sara, Pingault Jean-Baptiste, Viding Essi

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Disruptive behaviour disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, are a common set of diagnoses in childhood and adolescence, with global estimates of 5.7%, 3.6% and 2.1% for any disruptive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, respectively. There are high economic and social costs associated with disruptive behaviours and the prevalence of these disorders has increased in recent years. As such, disruptive behaviours represent an escalating major public health concern and it is important to understand what factors may influence the risk of these behaviours. Such research would inform interventions that aim to prevent the development of disruptive behaviours. The current review will identify the most stringent evidence of putative risk factors for disruptive behaviour from quasi-experimental studies, which enable stronger causal inference.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will be carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search of references published between 1 January 1980 and 1 March 2020 will be conducted using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Initial abstract and title screening, full-text screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers using Evidence for Policy and Practice Information (EPPI)-Reviewer 4 software. Quasi-experimental studies in the English language examining the association between any putative risk factor and a clearly defined measure of disruptive behaviour (eg, a validated questionnaire measure) will be included. We will conduct meta-analyses if we can pool a minimum of three similar studies with the same or similar exposures and outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed review does not require ethical approval. The results will help to identify risk factors for which there is strong evidence of causal effects on disruptive behaviours and also highlight potential risk factors that require further research. The findings will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and through presentations at international meetings and conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020169313.

Для цитирования: Karwatowska Lucy, Russell Simon, Solmi Francesca, De Stavola Bianca Lucia, Jaffee Sara, Pingault Jean-Baptiste, Viding Essi. Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence.. BMJ open. 2020. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038258.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.