MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5935/0004-2749.2024-0217

Медицинская библиотека · Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2025

Influence of intrastromal corneal ring implantation on intraocular pressure measurements using different tonometers in keratoconic eyes.

Scholte Christiano, Vieira Júlia Maggi, Torquetti Leonardo, Kanadani Fábio Nishimura

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of intrastromal corneal ring segment implants on the intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry, and noncontact tonometry in keratoconic corneas and analyze the intertonometer agreement.

METHODS

We enrolled 74 eyes in this observational and prospective study. Each participant had a complete eye examination, corneal analysis with Scheimpflug Tomography (Pentacam®), and intraocular pressure evaluation with Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry, and noncontact tonometry, before and after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation (on postoperative days 1, 7, 45, and 90). Intertonometer agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age was 29.9 ± 10.2 years, and 47 (63.5%) eyes had keratoconus grade II. Intraocular pressures were higher for noncontact tonometry preoperatively and on 90 postoperative day (mean ± SD: 12.4 ± 2.2 and 12.1 ± 2.2 mmHg, respectively), followed by Goldmann applanation tonometry (11.1 ± 3.0 and 11.2 ± 2.7 mmHg, respectively), and were lower for rebound tonometry (9.7 ± 3.4 and 9.4 ± 3.2 mmHg, respectively). The variation from the Goldmann tonometry on 7 postoperative day to the baseline (p=0.022) and that of noncontact tonometry on 90 postoperative day to the baseline (p=0.021) were statistically significant. The rebound tonometry underestimated intraocular pressure when compared with the Goldmann applanation tonometry by a mean of 1.47 ± 5.19 mmHg. Noncontact tonometry, when compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry, overestimated intraocular pressure by a mean of 1.23 ± 4.15 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

Despite statistically significant differences between some postoperative periods, the intraocular pressure measurement differences may not be clinically relevant.

Для цитирования: Scholte Christiano, Vieira Júlia Maggi, Torquetti Leonardo, Kanadani Fábio Nishimura. Influence of intrastromal corneal ring implantation on intraocular pressure measurements using different tonometers in keratoconic eyes.. Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia. 2025. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.2024-0217.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.