MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ans.70542

Медицинская библиотека · ANZ journal of surgery · 2026

Surveillance After Pelvic Exenteration: A Systematic Review of Oncological and Functional Follow-Up.

Siu Adrian Hang Yue, Joseph Konrad, Steffens Daniel, Carey Sharon, Solomon Michael, Koh Cherry

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Surveillance following cancer surgery with curative intent serves the purpose of permitting early detection of recurrent disease in addition to monitoring and management of post-resection functional sequelae. Although recommendations exist for most primary cancers, in the context of radical or re-operative surgery such as pelvic exenteration (PE), whether these strategies are appropriate is unclear. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the oncological and functional follow-up strategies after PE.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases for studies published between January 2000 and December 2024. Eligible studies reported long-term oncological and/or functional follow-up after PE. Studies including other surgical procedures, short-term (< 12 month) follow-up, non-English articles, and case reports were excluded. Data extracted included follow-up length, frequency, and investigation type. Risk of bias was assessed using the AGREE-II and ROBINS-I tools.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies were included, comprising 39 cohort studies and three non-original articles. Oncological follow-up, described in 28 studies, frequently included clinic visits every 3-4 months for the first 2-3 years, transitioning to annual reviews after 5 years. Modalities such as tumour markers, CT and MRI imaging, and colonoscopies varied widely. Functional follow-up was addressed in 19 studies, utilising validated instruments including the EORTC QLQ-C30 and SF-36. Most studies lacked standardisation, and no single article comprehensively addressed both oncological and functional aspects.

CONCLUSION

Current follow-up practices after PE exhibit significant heterogeneity, highlighting the need for standardised protocols. Future research should focus on appropriately sized prospective cohort studies and randomised trials to develop evidence-based guidelines tailored to the unique needs of this high-risk patient population.

Для цитирования: Siu Adrian Hang Yue, Joseph Konrad, Steffens Daniel, Carey Sharon, Solomon Michael, Koh Cherry. Surveillance After Pelvic Exenteration: A Systematic Review of Oncological and Functional Follow-Up.. ANZ journal of surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/ans.70542.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.