MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.joto.2024.02.002

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of otology · 2024

The effect of right versus left long-term single-sided deafness on sound source localization.

Xia Qingqing, Kang Shuoshuo, Wang Qian, Hong Mengdi, Chen Aiting, Chen Wei, Ji Fei, Li Jianan, Yang Shiming

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of right versus left long-term single-sided deafness (SSD) on sound source localization (SSL), discuss the necessity of intervention and treatment for SSD patients, and analyze the therapeutic effect of long-term unilateral cochlear implantation (UCI) from the perspective of SSL.

METHODS

This study included 25 patients with SSD, 11 patients with UCI, and 30 participants with normal hearing (NH). Their SSL ability was tested by obtaining their average root mean square (RMS) error values of SSL test.

RESULTS

The results showed that the RMS error value of SSD, UCI and NH groups were 52.26 ± 20.25°, 69.84 ± 12.14° and 4.27 ± 2.66°, respectively. The ability of SSL was better in the SSD-L group than that in the SSD-R group, and no significant difference existed in the SSD-R and the UCI group.

CONCLUSION

When bilateral deafness patients select unilateral treatment, right-side cochlear implantation may be more beneficial in terms of SSL, which means that the central auditory cortex in long-term SSD patients is affected differently based on which side their deafness occurs.

Для цитирования: Xia Qingqing, Kang Shuoshuo, Wang Qian, Hong Mengdi, Chen Aiting, Chen Wei, Ji Fei, Li Jianan, Yang Shiming. The effect of right versus left long-term single-sided deafness on sound source localization.. Journal of otology. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2024.02.002.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.