European journal of radiology · 2026
Establishment of portuguese diagnostic reference levels and trigger levels for radiation-induced tissue reactions in interventional neuroradiology.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lopes Rogério, Teles Pedro, Santos Joana
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To establish national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures in Portugal.
METHODS: A multicentre retrospective study was performed in six reference centres, including the six most common INR procedures: cerebral thrombectomy, cerebral arteriography, cerebral aneurysm embolisation, arteriovenous malformation (AVM) and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) embolisation, cerebral vasospasm treatment, and carotid artery stenting. Additionally, retinoblastoma embolisation, performed in a single Portuguese centre, was included. DRLs were defined as the 75th percentile (P75) of air kerma-area product (PKA, Gy·cm2), air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r, mGy), and fluoroscopy time (FT, min). Dose variability and trigger value exceedances were analysed according to procedural complexity and pathology.
RESULTS: Data of 1409 cases were analysed. The national DRLs in terms of PKA were: 109 Gy.cm2 cerebral thrombectomy, 72 Gy.cm2 for cerebral arteriography, 180 Gy.cm2 cerebral aneurysm embolisation, 366 Gy.cm2 AVM/AVF embolisation, 87 Gy.cm2 cerebral vasospasm, and 74 Gy.cm2 for carotid stenting. The corresponding Ka,r values were 746 mGy, 488 mGy, 2652 mGy, 4282,9 mGy, 511,0 mGy, and 520,3 mGy, and FT values were 16, 9, 39, 62, 9, 22 min, respectively. Procedural complexity factors assessed: thrombectomy attempts, aneurysm location, device selection, catheterised vessels. Retinoblastoma embolisation, demonstrated PKA 9,5 Gy.cm2, Ka,r 75,7 mGy, and FT 7,1 min.
CONCLUSIONS: This first Portuguese INR DRL study provides a national benchmark for the most common cerebral and neck procedures. AVM/AVF embolisation showed the highest percentage of trigger value exceedances. These results will support protocol optimisation and harmonisation of radiation protection practice across centres.
METHODS: A multicentre retrospective study was performed in six reference centres, including the six most common INR procedures: cerebral thrombectomy, cerebral arteriography, cerebral aneurysm embolisation, arteriovenous malformation (AVM) and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) embolisation, cerebral vasospasm treatment, and carotid artery stenting. Additionally, retinoblastoma embolisation, performed in a single Portuguese centre, was included. DRLs were defined as the 75th percentile (P75) of air kerma-area product (PKA, Gy·cm2), air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r, mGy), and fluoroscopy time (FT, min). Dose variability and trigger value exceedances were analysed according to procedural complexity and pathology.
RESULTS: Data of 1409 cases were analysed. The national DRLs in terms of PKA were: 109 Gy.cm2 cerebral thrombectomy, 72 Gy.cm2 for cerebral arteriography, 180 Gy.cm2 cerebral aneurysm embolisation, 366 Gy.cm2 AVM/AVF embolisation, 87 Gy.cm2 cerebral vasospasm, and 74 Gy.cm2 for carotid stenting. The corresponding Ka,r values were 746 mGy, 488 mGy, 2652 mGy, 4282,9 mGy, 511,0 mGy, and 520,3 mGy, and FT values were 16, 9, 39, 62, 9, 22 min, respectively. Procedural complexity factors assessed: thrombectomy attempts, aneurysm location, device selection, catheterised vessels. Retinoblastoma embolisation, demonstrated PKA 9,5 Gy.cm2, Ka,r 75,7 mGy, and FT 7,1 min.
CONCLUSIONS: This first Portuguese INR DRL study provides a national benchmark for the most common cerebral and neck procedures. AVM/AVF embolisation showed the highest percentage of trigger value exceedances. These results will support protocol optimisation and harmonisation of radiation protection practice across centres.