MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/circimaging.125.018745

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025

Diagnostic Performance and Interpreter Experience of 1-Hour Versus 3-Hour 99mTc-HMDP Cardiac Amyloid Radionuclide Imaging: A Prospective, Blinded Comparison.

Tersalvi Gregorio, Carey Patricia, Garmany Armin, Scott Christopher G, Zhang Jun, Maldonado Francisco J, Kruger Livia F, Hruska Carrie B, Johnson Geoffrey B, Jouni Hayan, Rodriguez-Porcel Martin G, Askew J Wells, Bois John P, Young Kathleen A, Anavekar Nandan S, Grogan Martha, Dispenzieri Angela, Chareonthaitawee Panithaya, Homb Andrew C, AbouEzzeddine Omar F

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend 3-hour cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging (CARI) for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Citing rapid blood clearance of 99mTc-hydroxymethylene-diphosphonate (HMDP) and efficient laboratory throughput, 1-hour imaging is increasingly practiced despite limited supporting evidence. We sought to compare diagnostic performance and interpreter experience of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (n=114) underwent both 1-hour and 3-hour HMDP single photon emission computed tomography (CT)/CT. Two cardiologist-radiologist reader teams, blinded to imaging timepoint (1 versus 3 hours), assessed overall interpretation, single photon emission CT-based Perugini grade, interpretation difficulty, interpreter confidence, and need for CT-fused images for anatomic localization. Discordant, equivocal, and difficult cases were arbitrated by a third tie-breaking team. The myocardial-to-blood-pool radiotracer uptake ratio (3-dimensional Score) was measured as a surrogate of contrast resolution.

RESULTS

Interinterpreter agreement was high at both time points (κ≥0.81), with more cases requiring arbitration at 3 hours versus 1 hour (22% versus 13%; P=0.049). Overall interpretation and Perugini grades were concordant between time points in 111/114 (97%) and 106/114 (93%) patients, respectively. Three patients (3%) were negative at 1 hour but equivocal at 3 hours, all of which were clinically ruled out for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Interpreter confidence was comparable at both timepoints (97% versus 95%; P=0.317). Compared with 3-hour imaging, contrast resolution was inferior (lower 3-dimensional score, P<0.001) and CT fusion was more frequently needed (57% versus 31%, P<0.001) at 1-hour imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective, blinded comparison of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI, diagnostic performance and interpreter experience were similar, with readers requesting CT fusion more frequently at 1 hour to optimize myocardial-to-blood pool discrimination.

Для цитирования: Tersalvi Gregorio, Carey Patricia, Garmany Armin, Scott Christopher G, Zhang Jun, Maldonado Francisco J, Kruger Livia F, Hruska Carrie B, Johnson Geoffrey B, Jouni Hayan, Rodriguez-Porcel Martin G, Askew J Wells, Bois John P, Young Kathleen A, Anavekar Nandan S, Grogan Martha, Dispenzieri Angela, Chareonthaitawee Panithaya, Homb Andrew C, AbouEzzeddine Omar F. Diagnostic Performance and Interpreter Experience of 1-Hour Versus 3-Hour 99mTc-HMDP Cardiac Amyloid Radionuclide Imaging: A Prospective, Blinded Comparison.. Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging. 2025. DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.125.018745.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.