MedElevator
Войти в исследования The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024
Nasal brushing molecular endotyping distinguishes patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps with better response to dupilumab.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gayvert Kaitlyn, Desrosiers Martin, Laidlaw Tanya M, Mannent Leda P, Patel Kiran, Horowitz Julie, Amin Nikhil, Jagerschmidt Alexandre, Hamilton Jennifer D, Lim Wei Keat, Harel Sivan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is evidence of pathophysiologic diversity in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), but data characterizing the molecular endotypes of CRSwNP and their association with treatment are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify gene signatures associated with CRSwNP endotypes, clinical features, and dupilumab treatment response.
METHODS: Nasal brushing samples were collected from 89 patients randomized to dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks or placebo in the SINUS-52 trial (NCT02898454). Microarrays were used to identify transcriptional clusters and assess the relationship between gene expression and baseline clinical features and clinical response to dupilumab. Endotype signatures were determined using differential expression analysis.
RESULTS: Two distinct transcriptional clusters (C1 and C2) were identified, both with elevated type 2 biomarkers. At baseline, C2 patients had higher mean Nasal Polyp Score and higher type 2 biomarker levels than C1 patients. At week 24, significant improvements in clinical outcomes (dupilumab vs placebo) were observed in both clusters, although the magnitude of improvements was significantly greater in C2 than in C1, and more C2 patients demonstrated clinically meaningful responses. Gene set enrichment analysis supported the existence of 2 molecular endotypes: C2 was enriched in genes associated with type 2 inflammation (including periostin, cadherin-26, and type 2 cysteine protease inhibitors), while C1 was enriched in genes associated with T cell activation and IL-12 production.
CONCLUSIONS: Two distinct gene signatures associated with CRSwNP clinical features were identified; the endotype signatures were associated with clinical outcome measures and magnitude of dupilumab response.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify gene signatures associated with CRSwNP endotypes, clinical features, and dupilumab treatment response.
METHODS: Nasal brushing samples were collected from 89 patients randomized to dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks or placebo in the SINUS-52 trial (NCT02898454). Microarrays were used to identify transcriptional clusters and assess the relationship between gene expression and baseline clinical features and clinical response to dupilumab. Endotype signatures were determined using differential expression analysis.
RESULTS: Two distinct transcriptional clusters (C1 and C2) were identified, both with elevated type 2 biomarkers. At baseline, C2 patients had higher mean Nasal Polyp Score and higher type 2 biomarker levels than C1 patients. At week 24, significant improvements in clinical outcomes (dupilumab vs placebo) were observed in both clusters, although the magnitude of improvements was significantly greater in C2 than in C1, and more C2 patients demonstrated clinically meaningful responses. Gene set enrichment analysis supported the existence of 2 molecular endotypes: C2 was enriched in genes associated with type 2 inflammation (including periostin, cadherin-26, and type 2 cysteine protease inhibitors), while C1 was enriched in genes associated with T cell activation and IL-12 production.
CONCLUSIONS: Two distinct gene signatures associated with CRSwNP clinical features were identified; the endotype signatures were associated with clinical outcome measures and magnitude of dupilumab response.