MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2310/7070.2003.13863

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of otolaryngology · 2003

Systematic review of intratympanic gentamicin in Meniere's disease.

Diamond Chris, O'Connell Daniel A, Hornig Joshua D, Liu Richard

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To assess and summarize the best available evidence for the use of intratympanic gentamicin in patients with Meniere's disease with respect to improvement of vertigo, tinnitus, and change in hearing.

METHODS

Comprehensive electronic searches were conducted on the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All generated titles were reviewed, and potentially relevant articles were assessed for inclusion. Data from included articles were extracted and summarized.

RESULTS

Overall pooled results on vertigo control revealed complete or substantial control in 89% of patients (study range 73-100%). Hearing was worsened in 26% (0-90%). Subjective improvement in tinnitus was seen in 57% of patients (0-82%). Different treatment protocols all resulted in similar rates of vertigo control.

CONCLUSIONS

Intratympanic gentamicin appears effective in controlling the symptoms of Meniere's disease, regardless of the protocol used. Although the literature on this treatment is extensive, there is a likelihood of significant bias in many currently published reports. There is a clear need for a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial to assess the true effectiveness of this treatment.

Для цитирования: Diamond Chris, O'Connell Daniel A, Hornig Joshua D, Liu Richard. Systematic review of intratympanic gentamicin in Meniere's disease.. The Journal of otolaryngology. 2003. DOI: 10.2310/7070.2003.13863.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.