MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mhn.2002.128071

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2002

Cost-effective diagnosis of acoustic neuromas: a philosophical, macroeconomic, and technological decision.

Murphy Mark R, Selesnick Samuel H

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Our goals were to define the most sensitive techniques of acoustic neuroma diagnosis, to examine their relative costs, and to propose diagnostic modality selection given the rarity of acoustic neuroma incidence and given the other costs that society faces in more commonly encountered diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a MEDLINE search of the English language from 1966 to 2001 using the following keywords: acoustic neuroma, acoustic tumor, vestibular schwannoma, diagnosis, cost effectiveness, MRI, auditory brainstem response, brainstem audiometric evoked response, incidence, and prevalence.

RESULTS

Although magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium remains the most sensitive diagnostic modality in the discovery of acoustic neuromas, its cost may be prohibitive for some societies.

CONCLUSION

Which modality to use in acoustic neuroma diagnosis is just as much a philosophical and macroeconomic question as a technological one.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The cost of a timely diagnosis of acoustic neuromas must be weighed against using resources for other, more pressing, health concerns.

Для цитирования: Murphy Mark R, Selesnick Samuel H. Cost-effective diagnosis of acoustic neuromas: a philosophical, macroeconomic, and technological decision.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2002. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2002.128071.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.