MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mhn.2001.112310

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2001

Continuous intratympanic infusion of gentamicin via a microcatheter in Menière's disease.

Schoendorf J, Neugebauer P, Michel O

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Between 1995 and 1998, 11 patients with disabling Menière's disease were treated at our institution with a continuous gentamicin infusion into the middle ear via a microcatheter. The patients had frequent attacks of vertigo and vomiting (functional levels 3-5). Hearing threshold on the affected side was significantly worse than on the healthy side (stage 4+5). Gentamicin was applied by a high-precision insulin pump with a flow rate of 40 mg per day directly in front of the round window. Application was stopped as soon as signs of vestibular affection appeared. A good overall control of vertiginous spells was achieved in 8 patients. Eight patients experienced complete hearing loss on the affected side, 1 experienced a slight worsening, and 1 had no hearing change. There was no correlation between the cumulative gentamicin dosage and the hearing loss. Our findings show that in terms of hearing loss and hospitalization time the continuous gentamicin application is inferior to other applications presented in the literature.

Для цитирования: Schoendorf J, Neugebauer P, Michel O. Continuous intratympanic infusion of gentamicin via a microcatheter in Menière's disease.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2001.112310.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.