MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2026.104025

Медицинская библиотека · Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.) · 2026

Reliability and validity of the L test in people with Alzheimer's disease.

Ozkan Taskin, Ates-Sari Yasemin, Unluer Nezehat Ozgul, Hangun Suleyman Furkan, Karadas Cagla, Eroglu Erdal

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess the test-retest reliability, minimum detectable change (MDC), and concurrent validity of the L test in people with Alzheimer's disease (PwAD).

DESIGN

A total of 37 PwAD participated in this study. To assess test-retest reliability, theL test was conducted twice at intervals of seven to ten days. The concurrent validity of the L test was evaluated using the TUG test, Elderly Mobility Scale, 2-Minute Walk Test (2-MWT), and 10-Meter Walk Test (10-MWT).

RESULTS

Excellent test-retest reliability was shown by the L test (ICC= 0.964). The MDC was found to be 5.77 s. There were moderate to strong associations between theL test and the other outcome indicators (correlation coefficients ranged from -0.410 to 0.763; p<0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

When it comes to evaluating functional mobility in PwAD, the L test shows excellent test-retest reliability. The L test was significantly related to TUG test, 10MWT, 2MWT, and Elderly Mobility Scale in PwAD. TheL test is a valid, reliable, practical, economical and valuable tool for assessing functional mobility in PwAD.

Для цитирования: Ozkan Taskin, Ates-Sari Yasemin, Unluer Nezehat Ozgul, Hangun Suleyman Furkan, Karadas Cagla, Eroglu Erdal. Reliability and validity of the L test in people with Alzheimer's disease.. Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.). 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2026.104025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.