Potential Causal Relationship Between Extensive Lipid Profiles and Various Hair Loss Diseases: Evidence From Univariable and Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Analyses.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Hair loss disorders, including non-cicatricial forms such as alopecia areata (AA) and androgenetic alopecia (AGA), as well as cicatricial forms, represent significant dermatological concerns influenced by various factors, including lipid metabolism. While observational studies and clinical trials have suggested a link between lipid levels and hair loss, the causal relationship remains unclear.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive analysis of 983 lipid variables [including triglycerides (TG), fatty acids, cholesterol, cholesterol esters, phospholipids, and lipoproteins] and 4 hair loss disorders. Two-sample univariable Mendelian randomization (UVMR) and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) analyses were employed to investigate the causal effects of lipids on hair loss disorders. Sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the robustness of our findings.
RESULTS
The UVMR analysis identified 56 significant causal associations between lipid levels and hair loss disorders, with cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), TG, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a) emerging as key contributors. The MVMR analysis evaluated the independent effects of HDL-C, LDL-C, and TG on alopecia disorders, identifying significant associations only between HDL-C, TG, and AA. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the consistency and robustness of these results.
CONCLUSION
This study provides strong evidence for potential causal associations between lipids and hair loss disorders, highlighting potential therapeutic targets and the importance of lipid management in affected patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.